 |
 |
Submitted by: Andrew K. Ticketed:  |
 |
Comments: 37 (Read/Post) |
 |
 |
|
 |
The Sentra SE-R easily outperforms any other Sentra on the road. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Make/Model: Nissan Sentra Posted by: Trooper |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
|
#21
|
3-08-2003 @ 12:54:51 PM
|
| Posted
By: Octane |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| That's funny, since I actualy own a blue SE-R... so I guess SE-R and a tint job is rice lol... |
|
|
#23
|
3-15-2003 @ 05:55:44 PM
|
| Posted
By: Zero |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| I'd say without that stupid badge, this car might actulaly look alright |
|
|
#25
|
3-16-2003 @ 09:12:07 PM
|
| Posted
By: northstar_V8 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| and so is a shitload of torque. it can run with a Z28 camaro, and definatley has a shorter stopping distance because of the decreased weight. But still, i'd take a camaro over this. gotta love the T-tops |
|
|
#26
|
3-17-2003 @ 11:10:08 AM
|
| Posted
By: der_panzer |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| The factory spoiler is a bit too large, and I'd have to remove the stupid "R" crap just out of principle, but otherwise it is a nice ride from the factory! |
|
|
#28
|
3-17-2003 @ 05:56:48 PM
|
| Posted
By: northstar_V8 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| well this looks like a Spec V, and it runs a 15.12 quarter mile. The camaro im thinking of (a 1996 Z28 with a 5-speed trasmission, mine) runs it in about 14.87 seconds, or so i've heard......i have never verified. but i dont want to get into any rice vs. american car debates. i think good cars can come from both continents. |
|
|
#29
|
3-17-2003 @ 06:04:55 PM
|
| Posted
By: SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #28, That's high for a LT1 Camaro time. They're 6-speeds btw. Newer Camaros with the LS1 (98-02) do mid 13s so I wouldn't even put the SE-R Spec V in the same class. |
|
|
#30
|
3-17-2003 @ 06:06:34 PM
|
| Posted
By: SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| The only thing I was able to find was the 0-60 for a 2002 SE-R Spec V. It's 7 seconds. Ouch. A 93-97 Camaro Z28 will do it in 5.7 sec and a 98-02 Z28 will do it in 5.4. |
|
|
#31
|
3-17-2003 @ 10:49:11 PM
|
| Posted
By: Lebo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #24, AND just because something is stock, doesn't mean its ok :P |
|
|
#32
|
3-18-2003 @ 11:22:22 AM
|
| Posted
By: solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #31, No but it's not like puting a GTR bage on a mustang or a type R badge on a civic. |
|
|
#33
|
3-18-2003 @ 09:54:25 PM
|
| Posted
By: northstar_V8 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
where did you get 5.4 seconds from? the 1998 SS Coupe, with 320hp stats:
Performance
Top Speed 257.5 kph / 160.0 mph 0 - 60 mph 5.5 seconds
0 - ΒΌ mile 13.9 seconds
taken from http://www.supercars.net
unless i'm mistaken, the trim levels for 1998 were base, Z28 and SS. where did you get 5.4 seconds from? |
|
|
#34
|
3-18-2003 @ 10:18:35 PM
|
| Posted
By: Octane |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Just so you guys know
the Sentra SE-R Spec-V has a 2.5 liter engine (175hp/185lbs) and does the 1/4 in low 15s stock
and as for the SE-R badging on Nissan subcompacts, it's been around for over 10 years
it's really not in the same class as the camaro... it's quick (fastest NA 4 cylinder/4door) but not a sports car like the camaro
[Edited by Octane on 3-18-2003 @ 10:19:27 PM] |
|
|
#35
|
3-18-2003 @ 10:50:44 PM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| yeah, you gotta remember that above all, this is a friggin Sentra for crying out loud. Although it's likely a fun, nimble, sprightly car, this is hardly something worth pitching arguments over. |
|
|
#36
|
3-19-2003 @ 06:17:39 PM
|
| Posted
By: SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#33, Sorry, make that 5.2 seconds......look here.
http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Cara...maro&page=1
Plus, the Z28 and the SS are closer than you might think (especially from 98-99). Stock LS1 Z28s have been shown to have 345hp and 365 ft. lbs of torque just like a stock 97-03 Vette (non Z06) has. They were just underrated to make the Vette look better. |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
